|
|
|
|
|
by sharedptr
994 days ago
|
|
Well I think I have some experience to talk about Japan. Not so much about Korea. My experience is that English in Japan isn’t really spoken outside of big tech firms and even there the quality isn’t great. I have tried organizing an event on the same topic in Japanese and in English, almost no one showed up in English but it was full in Japanese. They have their own alternatives to some services and stack overflow, qiita. The thing is that they don’t really need to speak English and for the cases they need English they bite a foreigner. |
|
The problem is that even with that, the mindset still appears to preserve the notion of Japanese supremacy over everything irrespective of data to the contrary. So improvement isn’t happening.
Take the Shinkansen as anotherq example. Impressive if you look at the train specs and reliability/punctuality. What isn’t seen so readily is the manual process of booking seats at stations with limited options for booking online. That manual process is often so inefficient that you might as well travel by a slower train given the loss of time involved.
Similar inefficiencies are observable throughout Japan. The people are typically oblivious because they are indoctrinated into following the process without questioning things. True of the younger English speakers as well from what I’ve seen. Not entirely sure if that’s blind deference, fear of conflict/group judgement or the result of brainwashing into a collaboration over competition mindset. Maybe it’s a mix of all of the above.
So I see very narrow examples of personal excellences where that obsession and perseverance doesn’t involve getting others on board. But innovation or improvement involving groups is more dysfunctional than anything I’ve seen elsewhere by a wide margin.