Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sharlos201068 996 days ago
If they did as you suggest, there are websites today that would start being rendered differently to before.

For the most part, browsers are very reluctant to make such changes.

1 comments

What is your assertion here? Old websites were saying "width: max-content" in the past? That they happened to ask for what was an invalid value that so happens to have this weird name?

Can you find any evidence that this happens? This seems incredibly fantastically super unlikely. And it was an invalid use if it did exist.

Sounds like a big huge bundle of nonsense FUD to me.

max-content/min-content/fit-content already exist, they aren't invalid.