What is your assertion here? Old websites were saying "width: max-content" in the past? That they happened to ask for what was an invalid value that so happens to have this weird name?
Can you find any evidence that this happens? This seems incredibly fantastically super unlikely. And it was an invalid use if it did exist.
Sounds like a big huge bundle of nonsense FUD to me.
Can you find any evidence that this happens? This seems incredibly fantastically super unlikely. And it was an invalid use if it did exist.
Sounds like a big huge bundle of nonsense FUD to me.