|
|
|
|
|
|
by ClayShentrup
992 days ago
|
|
|
cardinal (rated) voting methods are better than ordinal (ranked). so score voting, approval voting, and star voting are all good. approval voting is just score voting on a 0-1 binary scale. star voting is score voting on a 0-5 scale, followed by an "instant runoff" between the top two highest rated candidates. > public understanding and trust make a voting system more optimal. star voting: score the candidates from 0 - 5 and the winner is the majority favorite between the two highest rated overall. there's no risk with public understanding here. i've worked on this subject since 2006, and conducted exit polls with score voting ballots within months of getting into this issue. people understand it just fine. it's radically simpler than ranking. |
|
|