Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by xyzelement 995 days ago
Nobody would intentionally chose to do that...
1 comments
chromoblob 995 days ago
Why? Looks pretty imaginable to me.
link
xyzelement 995 days ago
Because it would be more profitable to get rid of rather than subsidize the bad product in that scenario.
link
chromoblob 995 days ago
No, "bad" here is only for consumers, for the business it could be profitable.
link
xyzelement 995 days ago
Maybe we have a different definition of the word "subsidize" then
link