That's even more true for oil and coal, but doesn't necessarily make them great choices.
Plus "concentrate" doesn't quite capture how there are inefficiencies in conversion: A lot of that sunlight gets wasted. A concentration of a portion of a portion.
> I wasn't making an argument about oil and gas versus solar.
I know, I'm mentioned them to demonstrate how "it's indirectly from sun energy" isn't automatically positive.
> Even more true of Nuclear
That seems like a stretch from "steady irradiance like with solar power" over to "stars death-sploding." It's a good thing the stuff we use in nuclear power wasn't formed from our sun, we aren't done with it yet.
Plus "concentrate" doesn't quite capture how there are inefficiencies in conversion: A lot of that sunlight gets wasted. A concentration of a portion of a portion.