... or paid to relocate individuals to places with houses. People dont like to talk about all the empty houses in less than desirable places. Rather, state governments and large businesses talk about needing to build housing everywhere cuz money.
Plenty of house are available in places with shrinking economies. Most folks would rather live where jobs are available. How does shipping people to tiny towns with no job prospects help anybody?
If there are more people in a place, there will be more demand for workers in the place to support the people, no?
If this is not sufficient we need to look at making places less dependent on centralized specialist geographic areas, because that approach does not scale well.
Not really, fertility rate is going down worldwide regardless of housing costs. Turns out rich families don't need or want as many children as those working the farm.