[mensetmanusman]

You don’t need to measure at scale, you just ask each supervisor to measure at micro-scale and provide more relevant feedback than a binary reader.

[jjk166]

You "just" need thousands of employees to do additional labor. And then you need to process all of that data, including adjusting for the variability in how supervisors measure performance.

[mensetmanusman]

“How is your team doing on a scale from 1-10?” might be more valuable than adding up the number of minutes people are breathing the office air.

[jjk166]

So if I said 8, what does that mean? What actions should be taken as a result? What value has been generated in collecting that data?

Attendance might not be a perfect proxy, but this is way worse.

[mensetmanusman]

8 means, ‘great, everyone is performing above expectations’