|
|
|
|
|
by philwelch
991 days ago
|
|
China has about three times the US population and it’s almost entirely concentrated along their coast. Passenger rail makes sense for that kind of population density. Where the US has similar density, it has Acela, which is the profitable part of Amtrak. China also has a massive construction bubble that the government keeps propping up in order to delay the inevitable correction. As a result they overbuild a lot of infrastructure, including passenger rail, well beyond the point of diminishing returns. |
|
But they have high speed rail across the sparsely populated interior as well - not as dense as the network on the coast, but it's there and it successfully competes with flying. So the sort of network that the west half of China has should be possible in the US.
> they overbuild a lot of infrastructure, including passenger rail, well beyond the point of diminishing returns.
Maybe. Or maybe they sensibly plan ahead and build infrastructure that will be needed in the near future. Time will tell.