[keepamovin]

If you cannot see how I reach the conclusion, then you’re not equipped to reply to it —doesn’t that follow?

What you’re saying is just ideology, you don’t have any facts or sources to back it up. I get that you don’t like article, but that’s insufficient to make it untrue.

[csydas]

i mean you can explain)) i explained why i cannot reach that and my points are there)) so please explain

[keepamovin]

> i mean you can explain)) i explained why i cannot reach that and my points are there)) so please explain

Sure, I get it can be confusing from your point of view. But what you are saying is ideological and your reactions. You are not countering any point in article with facts or sources. That's it. Does that make sense to you?