|
|
|
|
|
by rzimmerman
996 days ago
|
|
A counter philosophical take: As a human, I can live a perfectly happy, healthy life without eating animals. Statistically it’s healthier, cheaper, and has no downside other than taste (meat tastes good, no argument here). So ethically, how is eating meat any different than torturing and killing animals for pleasure? |
|
That’s completely false: a life without bacon is less happy than a life with bacon, and thus imperfectly happy.
> So ethically, how is eating meat any different than torturing and killing animals for pleasure?
The former involves deriving pleasure from eating flesh; the latter involves deriving pleasure from inflicting pain.