| >somewhat Its a universal human right, actually, to be able to record anything you can perceive in public ... without that right we cannot exercise political freedom or our rights as individuals for redress. >It's not reasonable to tell everyone who has an issue like this: "Well, don't go out into public then" Of course it is. They have equal rights - and equal opportunity, therefore, to express - or not express - these rights. It is entirely up to the individual to make the decision to exercise those rights and to not deny them to others for any reason, as it is a fundamental, universal human right to record others in public. |
No. It's not. Here: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-huma...
If you believe something is a right, and most other people don't, it's definitely not a universal right.
What is an established universal human right is: "No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks."
> without that right we cannot exercise political freedom or our rights as individuals for redress.
Yes. We can. We've done it since long before cameras existed, even. Where I live is moving towards a balance where, very grossly oversimplified:
- Government officials have very little privacy protection, and first amendment trumps privacy
- Private individuals have a lot of privacy protection, and privacy trumps first amendment
That seems reasonable.
I'd like corporations to have no privacy either, but that's not where we're landing.