[otabdeveloper4]

It's not a shallow dismissal.

The selling point of this thing is cross-language interoperability, and while they advertise it, they don't deliver.

Sorry, but if your "any language" is "Python or Javascript" your project hasn't even reached the proof of concept stage, it's just a vague idea at this point.

Supporting C++ and C will be 90% of the work and the real challenge.

[smokel]

The shallow dismissal that I was referring to is:

> What I think is that this is nothing more than a resume-bolstering effort that doesn't really need to exist and probably won't once OP lands a role at whatever FAANG company they're trying to impress.

The title of the post might be click-bait, but there is an obvious asterisk on the homepage of Carton, and even at a quick glance it is obvious that only very few languages are supported. The claim is so obviously false, that I don't mind. I would not expect support for INTERCAL or Awk.

Yes, it does not deliver, but that does not warrant the personal attack. The author of Carton actually already had internships at Google and Facebook, and currently works at Uber.

[capableweb]

Maybe you and I have different understandings about what "Proof of Concept" means, but if you're supposed to deliver cross-language interoperability and have successfully delivered it to three different languages with wildly different runtimes, I think I'd consider that a successful proof of concept and since you're demonstrated that the bindings works for at least two other languages, it's more or less trivial to get it to work for N other languages, so this is clearly beyond the proof of concept stage at this point, and trying to reach a maturity stage instead.

[3vidence]

I gotta agree here, I don't think the process of porting this to a wide array of languages is trivial.

Additionally I would have some serious performance concerns when it comes to marshaling the data across languages boundaries.