[anonyfox]

I am in the strictly "not worried" camp, on the edge of "c'mon, stop wasting time on this". Sure there might be some uproar if AI can paint a picture of mohammed, but these moral double standards need to be dealt with anyways at some point.

I am not willing to sacrifice even 1% of capabilities of the model for sugarcoating sensibilities, and currently it seems that GPT4 is more and more disabled because of the moderation attempts... so I basically _have to_ jump ship once a competitor has a similar base model that is not censored.

Even the bare goal of "moderating it" is wasted time, someone else (tm) will ignore these attempts and just do it properly without holding back.

People have been motivated by their last president to drink bleach and died - just accept that there are those kind of people and move on for the rest of us. We need every bit of help we can get to solve real world problems.

[jona-f]

I am thoroughly on your side and I hope this opinion get more traction. Humans will get obsolete though, just like other animals are compared to humans now. So it's understandable that people are worried. They instinctively realize whats going on, but make up bullshit to delude themselves from the fact that is the endless human stupidity.

[0xDEAFBEAD]

>Humans will get obsolete though, just like other animals are compared to humans now.

How is that working out for endangered species say, or animals in factory farms?

[jona-f]

Not great, so let's make our future AI overlords better than us. Dogs and cats are fine btw, I image our relationship with AI will be more like that. I don't know if anyone of us still lives when artificial consciousness will emerge, but i'm sure it will and it will quickly be superior to us. Imagine not being held back by remnants of evolution, like the drive to procreate. No ego, no jealousy, no mortality, pure thought. Funnily enough, if you think about it, we are about to create some sort of gods.

[Vecr]

I don't want humans to be obsolete, tell me what you think the required steps are for "human obsolescence" so I can stop them.

[anonyfox]

As a start, artificial life will be much better in withstanding harsh environments. No need fo breathable air, quite a temperature tolerance, … .

So with accelerating climate change humanity makes itself obsolete already over the next decades. Stop that first, everything else pales in comparison.

[jstarfish]

> Sure there might be some uproar if AI can paint a picture of mohammed

It can. He's swole AF.

(Though I'm pretty sure that was just Muhammad Ali in a turban.)

> People have been motivated by their last president to drink bleach and died - just accept that there are those kind of people and move on for the rest of us.

Need-to-know basis exists for a reason. You're not being creative enough if you think offending people is the worst possible misuse of AI.

People drinking bleach or refusing vaccines is a self-correcting problem, but the consequences of "forbidden knowledge" frequently get externalized. You don't want every embittered pissant out there to be able to autogenerate a manifesto, a shopping list for Radio Shack and a lesson plan for building an incendiary device in response to a negative performance review.

Right now it's all fun exercises like "how can I make a mixed drink from the ingredients I have," but eventually some enterprising terrorist will use an uncensored model trained on chemistry data...to assist in the thought exercise of how to improvise a peroxide-based explosive onboard an airplane, using fluids and volumes that won't arouse TSA suspicion.

Poison is the other fun one; the kids are desperate for that inheritance money. Just give it time.