|
|
|
|
|
|
by LindeBuzoGray
1002 days ago
|
|
|
> And no, working 32 hours is not as productive as 40 hours. By this logic, working 48 hours is more productive, working 54 hours even more productive, 62 hours even more productive. It can be cranked up even more - the English did and took meticulous records on it. Dialecticaly it created a strong Labour party which took power in 1945 and nationalized coal, the bank of England, hospitals, telecommunications, national rail, iron and steel - the commanding heights of the economy. |
|
|