|
|
|
|
|
by moritzwarhier
994 days ago
|
|
I agree. In the example case, I don't see why left-to-right or top-to-bottom would be more readable. Sure, it is good most of the time, but operator precedence rules exist for a reason. I don't want to read 2.chain(x => x * 2).chain(f)
instead of f(2*x)
These patterns have their place for async programming, pure FP, streams and more.They can also be a distraction. E.g. the library introduces its own promise-unwrapping semantics and more. I don't see the use for such a generic implementation, although I applaud the effort. |
|