[kruhft]

No examples. Bad name. Why is it better than cl-who and parenscript together?

Nice job though. The code is clean.

[svetlyak40wt]

Spinneret is better than CL-WHO at least in it's string escaping policy. All values are escaped by default whereas with CL-WHO you need to wrap with CL-WHO:ESC all string values.

Thus CL-WHO is vulnerable to XSS attack by default.

[junon]

If you scroll just a tiny bit there is a large, complete example.

[svetlyak40wt]

Parenscript is other tool. Mainly it generates Javascript. However it has support for CL-WHO like templating for generating HTML on client side.

[kruhft]

I looked through the code and found some parenscript, or at least something that reminded me of parenscript alot.

Just bringing up some history. I don't know the age profile of the developers or readers anymore.

Just trying to look smart.

[medo-bear]

I see examples