Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hexo 1004 days ago
systemd is extremely intrusive. anything dependent on it is a failure.
2 comments

This is such a bizarre comment. I run systemd a number of Linux machines currently but does that mean they are failing? Is taking advantage of systemd's features a failure? They run and do their function so in what sense are they failing or what does failure mean?
By my calculations, considering much of the world runs on RH/Ubuntu/Debian, all of which use systemd, things depending on systemd are far from being a failure, cos they'll run on the majority of systems.
systemd is a festival of power centralization and bad design. quite opposite of what linux should be.