[WillPostForFood]

Unity is running as fast as possible in the opposite direction of Friedman's advice.

The businessmen believe that they are defending free enterprise when they declaim that business is not concerned “merely” with profit but also with promoting desirable “social” ends; that business has a “social conscience” and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers.

San Francisco based Unity is on the vanguard of the new socially aware Corp.

https://unity.com/esg

https://unity.com/unity-uk-binary-gender-pay-gap-report

https://unity.com/inclusion-diversity

[CountVonGuetzli]

Interesting that this is enough evidence to the contrary for you. To me that looks more like what they say, not what they do, and is a well crafted smoke screen. They still seem to be acting as if they’re purely interested in extracting maximum shareholder value, at the expense of the public.

[WillPostForFood]

Interesting that this is enough evidence to the contrary for you.

It is just a few easy examples. I've used Unity for a decade, visited the offices, worked with ex-Unity employees. They aren't maximizing shareholder value, they are very bloated, and they are trying to survive and avoid bankruptcy.

at the expense of the public.

What does that even mean? There is no expense to the public. They give their product to 90% of developers for free. Unity used to charge every seat.