[myshpa]

The quote you've posted is missing current numbers. We're now at 50%.

"In a 2020 journal article for the American Society on Aging, Kushel wrote that of all the homeless single adults in the early 1990s, 11% were aged 50 and older. By 2003, she says that percentage grew to 37%.

Now, the over-50 demographic represents half of the homeless single adults in the U.S. — with no sign of their numbers slowing, leaving baby boomers (those aged 57 to 75) particularly vulnerable."

[glimshe]

Thank you - one thing that can be slightly misleading when reading this number is that 50% of the homeless adults are over 50. This doesn't mean (and you didn't say so) that 50% of the adults over 50 are homeless. It's not possible to know, by just reading this percentage, whether the homeless situation of older adults is getting better or worse in total numbers.

[3np]

Further, those numbers alone could also be very good: it could just mean that less people get and will get homeless.

That's of course not the case and the actual situation is not good, just sayin'. Good case of how you can spin statistics to tell a story.

[qznc]

This metric is weird. Is it somehow better if “young” adults were homeless?

[Ensorceled]

No one is implying it's better or worse.

It's important to know because it changes the problem ... if a lot of homeless people are elderly the solutions need to be different than if they are younger.

For instance it's not "job training and introductions into the work force" if these people are past working age.

[rthomas6]

I don't think that was implied, but yes! I'd rather be homeless at 20 than homeless at 70. Wouldn't you? At least I'd be less likely to die from a fall. At least I'd be more able to defend myself/run away.

[Scarblac]

What percentage of adults in the US are over 50?