[tastroder]

I meant your website and resume that you linked there. If this is not some weird thought scenario, pointing her to the public forum you use to discuss alternatives to her simply talking to whoever's responsible for her comsec doesn't seem like the greatest idea. If this is an actual problem it's not yours to solve and certainly has solutions that aren't this... convoluted.

[logicallee]

>If this is an actual problem it's not yours to solve and certainly has solutions that aren't this... convoluted.

Yeah, I took that view for a while. For example she gets my physical mail, so in theory I could just send her a burner phone myself, they could be like here this is personal you can't take it inside and she can say no problem and have the phone. But I took the view that this is really not my problem to solve.

[tastroder]

Terribly sorry to harp on what the others in this thread have said but it seems like you've either been negligently briefed (due to the implausible scenarios you're describing and that you're posting this tied to your real identity, their first name on your website - assuming that's more real than the ChatGPT Ph.D. and other random entries there -, and your previous HN submission) or you're being lied to.

[logicallee]

>you've either been negligently briefed

negligence doesn't begin to describe it.