|
|
|
|
|
by BoorishBears
993 days ago
|
|
"advising clients" is such an odd way of describing "making a complex topic approachable" But you're correct, this is HN: so much pontificating without producing a single counterfactual implies you should speak for yourself and not the collective. They said "LLM", but given the context it's an RLHF LLM, and presumably they want a generalized way to add factual information in a way that doesn't cripple the model's general performance (yes, I am being so arrogant as to draw obvious conclusions to give them a useful answer) No paper on the subject has achieved this, the ones that come close (and by close I mean very far) fall back to BERT sized models which I already addressed below: so please petition your "enterprise" to share their secrets (wrong crowd to get any gravitas out of the word enterprise btw, we understand it means "constrained usecase with minimal external validation") |
|