|
|
|
|
|
by strdanger334
1001 days ago
|
|
> India should have plenty of evidence to be able to charge him, try him, and convict him in absentia, then demand Canada extradite him. That they haven't done so is a strong hint that they don't have enough evidence that would hold up in a modern justice system. You really need to read up on Indian laws and history. In absentia conviction isn't a thing in Indian law. It is part of a recent proposed change:
https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/ch.... But this is just smoke and mirrors. People in the West don't care for Indian legal system. Because "freedom of expression", "Hindu nationalists" and what not. So, this isn't going to help anyways. |
|
But I also think you underestimate the West's perception of India. By and large, people do see the country as a democratic, powerful, diverse, proud empire.
I'm not speaking for the racists, but those are the same everywhere.
What people DON'T care for is Modi's Hindutva, his populist movement that makes people so angry online, or the extra-judicial policies that they've followed to just name certain people (like Nijjar) as terrorists, and then make no other effort to prove their guilt.