|
|
|
|
|
|
by eviks
997 days ago
|
|
|
What's up with the extreme estimats? And if you get 100s results instead of 0? And what if it's not 90%, but 50%? It's definitely wrong for me, I most often use it to exclude irrelevant results, and I'd imagine it's also wrong in general case for such a targeted search engine The "effort" is using the same typo detection algorithm you use for non-quoted search to display the same warning Also the benefit of a warning is that you can press a correction link to automatically fix and restart search, which is better UI |
|
|
If you were a paying customer you could submit this idea in the forums and someone will actually look into it. I have sent in a few ideas and I think most have been accepted and fixed/implemented within a few weeks.