|
|
|
|
|
|
by mach1ne
994 days ago
|
|
|
Your link is interesting, but I don't like your take on somehow this argument between behaviorism and Chomsky being solved and the former being now "ridiculous looking back". This is just the dance of theories, and as a matter of fact, Chomsky has lately started to look like he is quite wrong assessing that a genetic component is required for language acquisition. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/007180 |
|
|
Such is the march of science. It's okay to be wrong as long as you were falsifiable to begin with.