| the whole problem i'm describing here is you (codeonfire). and it doesn't surprise me that you don't see it. let me try to show you. you've wrongly (psycho)analyzed me/my viewpoint (i'm upset HN losing it's hip factor), misrepresented my proposal (censorship), then took your own analysis as a fact, and called me/my opinion "stupid" and "wrong" based on that. of course, you didn't stop there, to add a bit of sarcasm and humor, you went on and checked the domain name that would remedy my non-existing problem. that's why i thanked you for proving my point. this is a great example of low-quality hate content. it almost is a template, we can write a bot that exactly does what you do. i'd normally not write back and pass, like many others, but just for this post's sake, i'm keeping this conversation on. also you said my links were pointless, let's put some other links here, quick glance at your comment history: http://d.pr/CChr
http://d.pr/IUYL
http://d.pr/Hk9d just to clarify, despite of low quality content you produce (to be fair, i also saw neutral ones) i'd never ban you, wouldn't try to suppress anything you want to say. i respect your viewpoint as much as you disrespect me and others. i'd just like this system to put some measures so you express them respectfully. that's all. |
Lets be clear. I never made any personal comments, and you didn't really offer an idea except to say that your goal is to "balance negatives and positives" I said any attempts to censor comments to meet your ideal comment is stupid and wrong, and whether or not censorship is what you want, I don't see why someone would disagree with this. If you start removing comments that one person doesn't like, then a forum becomes a simple pr blog.
"despite of low quality content you produce..." "i'd just like this system to put some measures so you express them respectfully..."
in the interests of moving on, i won't comment on these.