[fjgvcjygjvh]

If the 30k per figure was accurate (I don't think it is?) it would be certainly unreasonable for the rest of the society to subsidize it.

So I guess, no. But they shouldn't expect other people to finance their sex lives.

[elil17]

The options aren't shell out $30k/year or let people get AIDs. There's a missing third option: don't let drug companies charge so much money, especially when the government paid for the development of the drug!