| HN Mirror

I think it is fair to say that without the GPL and GNU, there would have been no Linux as we know it today.

I mean that's true and commendable but the OP was speaking towards the future. And on our current trajectory the future is only becoming more and more decoupled from GNU. From the downvotes though I've either come across as combative or sarcastic I suspect.

phkahler 1010 days ago

>> I mean that's true and commendable but the OP was speaking towards the future. And on our current trajectory the future is only becoming more and more decoupled from GNU.

That's the point. The only way to prevent the bad outcome is for GNU and GPL to make a comeback. People need to understand and care about it first if it's every to prevent the bad future.

Fair enough. But does it really matter what all the dumb terminals are running, when most of the infra(servers) is running full blown GNU/Linux?

It's a hard question to answer because really it depends on what you consider relevant computing in my opinion as well as how you interpret the post I was replying to. Despite the profit dominance of Apple for example, Android smartphones are the computer of the common man worldwide and so by extension the common man is coming into less and less contact with GNU. From that perspective it's hard to say that GNU will be part of what helps "avoid the seemingly inevitable slide into a techno-totalitarian future" as the original poster put it.

> the common man is coming less and less contact with GNU.

Compared to when? Would the Android experience differ substantially if it included the GNU userland?

I'd argue no : the common man does not compile, write shell scripts or writes it's own software.

Or are you argueing that somehow GNUCash for example would be more popular?

You can look at Windows or OSX to see what is important to the common man. And it is not build tools / infra, and I think that is fine.

I'm not really sure I see what you're driving at. I mean yes, GNU's never been thaaat relevant to most people. That doesn't change that in the context of the OPs original point it's hard to see GNU as having done anything but lost ground in contemporary times. Which in turn makes it hard to see a way it'd be a path towards whatever salvation was being opined on. If the primary vehicle for GNU's propagation before was situations that saw it bundled with Linux we're now in a time where there's countless mainstream Linux devices and virtually none of them incorporate GNU.

Since we're at the limit of what the comment chain permits, I'm not really sure I see what you're driving at in your followup reply to me. I mean yes, GNU's never been thaaat relevant to most people. That doesn't change that in the context of the OPs original point it's hard to see GNU as having done anything but lost ground in contemporary times. Which in turn makes it hard to see a way it'd be a path towards whatever salvation was being opined on.

We are not at the limit : you are replying too soon.

To be able to reply without pause, click the timestamp.

pjmlp 1010 days ago

And even the Linux kernel might one day be changed for Zirkon.

riffraff 1010 days ago

didn't google all-but-abandon Fuchsia's development (and thus Zircon)?

There was a bunch of lay-offs in January, in July they announced the smart speakers would not use it, and AFAIU the only product using it (the Nest Hub) is supposed to be replaced by the Pixel Tablet.

https://fuchsia-review.googlesource.com/q/status:open+-is:wi...

pjmlp 1010 days ago

Not sure, at least officially, Fuschia is still going.