Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by permo-w 1011 days ago
with a 1Gbps connection you're still looking at ~248 hours to download, and that's if the remote server can keep up, which it almost certainly can't

this is assuming by 1Gbps you mean 1 Gigabit/s rather than 1 Gigabyte/s

2 comments

Not sure where 248 hours came from.

38 terabytes = 304 terabits.

304 terabits / 1 gigabit/second = 304,000 seconds

304,000 seconds =~ 84 hours. Add 20% for not pegging the line the whole time and the limits of 1gbps ethernet, and perhaps 100 hours is reasonable.

my mistake, I swapped the 38tb and 112tb from parent comment

whatever the download size is, you're bottlenecked by the remote server's up speed

If the "remote server" is Azure, the target throughput is 0.5gbps ... for each large blob (of which this leak includes many). It seems pretty likely you'll be able to download at a few gigabits per second if your local connectivity allows.
that's a big if
We're talking about exfiltrating data from incorrect permissions on Azure, so it's not an if. It's a given for the situation in the article that we're discussing in this thread.
that's not quite true. the article discusses a transfer from Azure to Github. The article does not say where the files are currently hosted, besides being publicly available on Github. It's probably Azure, but it could easily also be whatever Github use
But you don't need to download everything. Even 1/10th of that could be juicy enough. Or 1/100th.