|
|
|
|
|
by yieldcrv
1010 days ago
|
|
The fair use argument is quite strong If you dissect the plaintiffs claim they are arbitrarily conflating training and regurgitating Training is using for criticism and comparison purposes, hence fair use And there is no lawsuit against what it regurgitates and the purpose of its output, whether someone asks it to give a list for comparison purposes, or specifically asks it for a story that has a plagiarized result |
|