[richardanaya]

Where's your attributions for all the words written in your comment ;P you remixed the words and grammar patterns from other people's creative common's licenses of other people writings!

Note: i'm declaring my comment license as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

So if you remix or transform my comment by responding it, please attribute to me your response.

[edgyquant]

Humans are not LLMs trained and operated by a company for profit. Your argument is that LLMs hold all the same basic rights as humans but they hold (and should hold) exactly none.

[tpmoney]

That might be the implied argument, but the explicit argument appears to be the licensing a grouping of words as a work and then declaring any use of any of those words or letters in any order to be a transformation of that work without any other context or evidence of transformation is silly. We could rephrase the OP's post as:

>I found [logs of users from Paramount's writers offices reading] my blog recently. Assuming they used that data, when will they attribute me?

To see that the idea on the face is silly. OP has no evidence that any of their work was used at all, or even that what was used could even be covered under the license in the first place.

[dvngnt_]

which works specially?

profit vs non profit also makes a difference