|
|
|
|
|
by Animats
1005 days ago
|
|
> I think the root problem is political: recognizing that USA's extraordinarily successful mid-century economic model was the result of a compromise by the ruling capitalists to avoid facing a European-style revolution (e.g. Bolshevism) at home. Yes. Communism was a competitor which kept capitalism from acting like a monopoly.
Once communism was no longer taken seriously, capitalism was unrestrained.
When the USSR finally ran down, there was no stopping the push to plutocracy. It's not that communism was a better system. It was that the existence of an alternative kept capitalism from getting out of control. |
|