[RandomLensman]

Parallax effect? Echos? Misinterpreted sensor readings... endless list of possibilities and combinations. Have a lot of sensors, see a lot of odd things - nothing new.

[monocasa]

It was seen visually, with IR, and via RADAR, each from multiple observers.

[RandomLensman]

So what? Something caused that observation, but it wasn't something extraterrestrial. You also have to allow for one of the sensors to be wrong/noisy etc. and then being interpreted through the lens of observation via another.

[qaq]

None claiming it is extraterrestrial but there is no evidence to the contrary either. You have too many diverse independent sensors that lined up.

[RandomLensman]

Doesn't work that way: there is always an infinite list of possibilities without evidence to the contrary if you allow for a wide enough "solution space" (even if you have already an explanation).

[monocasa]

What you're saying is unfalsifiable.

[RandomLensman]

Isn't it highly falsible? Show that sometimes there is only a finite set of possibilities no matter the solution space.