[robertlagrant]

> You keep implying that it’s rational for c levels to be working remote and then implying that regular employees only want wfh because they are just anti social.

Why change what was said? The statement wasn't about "c levels" - it was one person who is on the road a lot meeting customers. Like a super senior sales role. That's different to team/collaboration-based roles where colocation might (just before you change this too: remember - might) well massively improve things.

[lovich]

Then you should specify that you believe the role is effectively a senior sales position instead of referring to them as a ceo, hence you talking about c levels. If you think all ceos are in this situation then you effectively are referring to c levels.

If you want to season your comments about regular employees with “might” you should also do that from the get go. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt as this is hacker news and not Reddit, but opening up the position by stating

> Meanwhile, the brand of WFH HN folks want is to not leave the house and interact with real humans in person.

Doesn’t give the impression that you have a nuanced take on the matter and came off like you were categorically against regular employees working from home

[robertlagrant]

> Then you should specify that you believe the role is effectively a senior sales position instead of referring to them as a ceo

I've made one comment where I did that (although of course we need to call him a CEO because that's his job title). What are you talking about?