|
|
|
|
|
by bell-cot
1001 days ago
|
|
> Either that's against the rules or it is not. If the rules were actually that simple, the world would need far fewer lawyers. But - whether you say "rules that simple can't work when the world is vastly more complex", or "rules-writing lawyers aren't stupid enough to write their own kind out of their jobs" - the rules are definitely not that simple. |
|
I'd argue that's the main reason for not making a law though, if it's too complicated for the average person to read and understand where the line is drawn then we shouldn't draw it.