Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by safety1st 1007 days ago
Yeah I don't really have a problem with this. They are just going to a large electricity user and saying "we'll give you some free electricity later if you stop using it now." When the alternatives are brownouts or giving the grid operator the power to force businesses to suspend their operations, this is better.

As usual lots of hot takes from people who just read the headline
1 comments
Eddy_Viscosity2 1007 days ago
Why doesn't the market decide, if the bitcoin miners got 20,000% rate increases they would stop on their own for free. If the rate goes to zero, they will surely jump in an use as much as their hardware can burn. Why are payments outside of rate changes necessary at all?
link
bradfa 1007 days ago
Because the grid needs a very large consumer to stop RIGHT NOW and be under contract to do so when told. To get this contract, the grid promises money. There is no guarantee that adjusting the power cost for a customer will make them stop consuming power when it is needed. The contracts are in place to ensure the grid operator KNOWS that they can achieve stability when they need it.
link
Eddy_Viscosity2 1006 days ago
Why can't the grid operator just put "we reserve the right to shut off your power if demand exceeds our capacity" in their TOS?
link