Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by throwawa14223 1002 days ago
> I think that a modular and rich standard library such as Go's or Node.js's offers way higher productivity to developers, consistency to the ecosystem and reduced costs for businesses.

Is the Go standard library really considered rich? Coming from languages like python or ruby I found it pretty lacking. Admittedly I haven't used Go in 3 years.

1 comments

All of these things are a spectrum. For network services especially, Go's standard library is generally considered pretty comprehensive, yes. In comparison to Rust specifically, like the context of the post, I don't think anyone could really argue a different way, though if you're comparing to something else, or for a different kind of task, it's possible that you may have a different opinion, sure.
I felt like it had a lot to do things web related but was pretty lacking on primitives for algorithms and data structures out of the box.