Only when you take the quote out of context. For the majority of the article he focuses on gender. And in the very same paragraph as that quote comes from he invokes J.K. Rowling. It is entirely reasonable to assume that transgender people are "the oppressed minority" he's specifically talking about.
My takeaway is it reads like a scientific publication; here’s authors premise, and author walks through an example of what they mean.
The title and subtitle are generic enough to apply to any of the tribal bubbles bleating online about a sense of persecution; Gurner and the CEO class, right wingers, politicians.
Hallucinations of persecution are not just coming from the trans community. It’s just easier to write a coherent article using one example.
You’re being weird. I thought you hadn’t read the article when you asked “Why did you invoke gender?”. They’re just talking about the same thing the article is.
That’s what the entire article is about.
Trans people: “Please don’t be rude to me. This is how you can be nice”
Dawkins: “My being rude to you isn’t the same as violence.”
Trans people: “Ok… why would you feel the need to say that unless you wanted to be violent to us?”
Dawkins: “You’re calling me violent! That’s policing my speech which is oppression!”