|
|
|
|
|
by GlickWick
1004 days ago
|
|
Because an inversion of responsibility happens at some turning point of organization size. A small company that wants to survive has to spend a lot of effort and engineering hours becoming compliant with the legislation. If they fail to do so, the following legal battle and potential fines have a high probability of bankrupting them. They must be proactive to avoid this. Large corporations instead get to be reactive. They comply where it’s convenient and otherwise operate on an “ask forgiveness later” mindset. Legal battles and billion dollar fines barely register and instead of becoming destructive events, just become minor taxes on doing business. As much as I appreciate the spirit of the legislation, the implementation has actually empowered large companies and is squeezing out small business. |
|