[tacker2000]

Of course it’s possible, but now you need more people with DB and SQL knowledge.

Also, using views and stored procedures with source control is a pain.

Deploying these into prod is also much more cumbersome than just normal backend code.

Accessing a view will also be slower than accessing an “original” table since the view needs to be aggregated.

[_a_a_a_]

> Accessing a view will also be slower than accessing an “original” table since the view needs to be aggregated.

Where does it say anything needs aggregating. You can have a view that exists just for security.

> Also, using views and stored procedures with source control is a pain. Deploying these into prod is also much more cumbersome than just normal backend code.

Uh? This is normal backend code.

[Shorel]

I don't see the problem here.

Are modern developers allergic to SQL or what is the issue?

[tacker2000]

Not all devs are proficient in SQL. Its another skill that is required.