|
|
|
|
|
|
by dTal
1009 days ago
|
|
|
> ignoring cloud coverage (which has 3-20x the magnitude of effects of carbon) This is like complaining that tidal models are useless because they ignore waves, which have a larger effect on water height than tides. (The same analogy applies to claims of the form "how can we possibly predict the climate decades ahead of time when we can't predict the weather 2 weeks from now") |
|
|