[melagonster]

they offer sequences! this is a very good detail, but only the similarity of DNA is not enough. the golden standard is perlfoming a phylogenetic tree reconstruction. if it is true that more tahn 95% DNA of human same as this species, the most probaly hypothesis is that this species is another species closet to human and other primates. finally, because they offered data, we just need to wait someone perform phylogenetic tree reconstruction analysis.

p.s., so they almost say this is not a alien.(if this is true)

and I don't know how they get enough DNA. besides, NCBI automatically assigned these data belong Homo sapiens?

[bloak]

If the "DNA analysis" isn't entirely invented then my guess is that they have analysed the DNA of a mixture of microorganisms that happened to be present on the specimens.

[synctext]

Lets take the bait Internet! 2017 Debunk of this story: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/alien-mummy-peru/

Technical DNA report of 24 pages with awesome URL: https://www.the-alien-project.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12... Done by these people in Mexico, with failing website: www.linkedin.com/company/abraxas-biosystems/about/

``` To proceed with the NGS run a library of the fragments to sequence has to be prepared first. This library preparation method was performed by CEN4GEN using a specialized protocol proprietary of CEN4GEN labs and reagents kits based on a commercial kit called Kapa Hyper Prep that were optimal to recover fragmented DNA for ancient samples. The results of the library construction methods were successfully performed for the 3 MDA amplified samples as shown below. ```

[timbit42]

That one on Snopes was found at Nasca. Different body.

[twisted_vector]

but thats gaia and different mummies gaia is known for low effort cringe conspiracy

[melagonster]

because it closet to human, a probably way is that someone uaed body of primates to fake these specimen, like the "mermaid specimen" in Japan.