|
|
|
|
|
by greatwave1
1009 days ago
|
|
Literally every world-famous work has replicas and recreations, what's your point? Those copies are also part of the work's cultural influence, and in many cases (if the replicas are sold by the original artist) part of the monetary value as well. This doesn't provide any more credence to the falsity that art's scarcity is the source of its value (when overwhelming evidence proves that the exact opposite is true) |
|
Those replicas and recreations are recreations of a... single, scarce work.
That's famous precisely because there is one original.
But if that's not true, it should be possible to point to, say, a series of similar paintings or musical compositions that are all famous.
Generally, that's not the case though.
Because people want one thing.
The one Mona Lisa. The one officially-blessed Taylor Swift album. The one version of Beethoven's Fifth.
Complexity and variety confuses simple people and the market.