Understood that you are not native english speaker and use AI to enhance the content.
I would advise to ask AI to share some ways to make the content more concise and incorporate learnings from those suggestions rather than copying them directly. That would keep the human element still around.
These days, I personally find articles with minor grammatical errors more interesting than AI assisted/enhanced/corrected content, because AI generated content often comes off bland and loses the rawness of author's intentions. Just personal opinion of course. :)
It's ' -- the reviews show how' in the title instead of summarising how or even just not saying that that does it for me, I won't click something like that.
The post reads fine, I don't understand why others think it's AI generated.
About the post content: I found the analysis itself a bit shallow, but I really appreciate this new perspective on doing review-first analysis without even trying the app first, since it's something I've never considered
If you don't see this as AI generated... I dunno what to tell you. It was pasted right out ChatGPT.. the short paragraphs, passive phrasing, and tone - lots of wiggle phrases like "But not many know about this solution." "Nevertheless, I was surprised to see how many reviewers mentioned in the comments how much storage and time they saved! Some reviews even mention the actual numbers the app gave them." "
Lots of words to say nothing of substance.
If it reads like a bad high school essay - it's ChatGPT!
ChatGPT didn't learn how to write in that way due to its own efforts. It had to be trained on a mountain of blogspam, which is written in the exact same way.
All ChatGPT does better is produce blogspam with more consistent grammar, and over a wider range of topics than any single person could quickly understand.
>If it reads like a bad high school essay - it's ChatGPT!
The useful part about the "If it's vapid then it's probably an LLM" test is that even if it ISN'T an LLM, it's still vapid and bad in the same way, and basically needs the same solution:
Folks, if you want to write, take writing classes somewhere.
Thanks for commenting, I have no reason to not believe you so please take my comment as constructive =)
For context, phrases like "We'll take a look at" are what typically lead me to lean towards AI being part of the mix. There are other things about the article that did that too but they may be related to you working in a non-native language.
One aspect of analysis ignored is review stuffing as a possible explanation for the repetition of keywords. At $2M/mo there's almost certainly a portion of the marketing budget going to inflating reviews.
As an aside, I found an app that deletes all photos except your favorites. This way I can go through my photos and mark the ones I want to keep and delete the rest. Then I copy those photos to storage.