Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by axitanull 1007 days ago
Open sources can have a restrictive license, just because a project doesn't use WTFPL doesn't mean it's not open source.
1 comments

https://opensource.org/osd/

According to the open source initiative, that’s exactly what it means.

MIT license is not copy left like GPL, but it’s open source.

The llama license is not.