[borissk]

Any time I asked ChatGPT or another GPT a question regarding science (haven't asked any questions on other topics) I got a mostly correct answer back. And I've asked a few hundred by this point. This includes state of the art research covered in just one or a few articles.

So I'm curious why my personal experience doesn't match all the complains about hallucinations.

[chefandy]

I think the usefulness is pretty domain-specific. Every time I've given it a citation for a not-super-famous court opinion, it very confidently told me about a plausible-sounding case that never happened between people and companies that never existed.