Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by the_third_wave 1018 days ago
That 'carbon impact' is negligible - if even worth thinking about - compared to the environmental impact (which, remember, is totally unrelated to 'carbon impact') of creating that hardware in the first place. If you have something lying around which can be used and it does not come with an onerous power bill, jet-engine fans, vacuum tubes in a fridge-sized cabinet (although that would certainly have some charm) or unobtainable parts by all means use it instead of a new SBC. I use a number of old mobile devices in this way where I would otherwise have employed SBCs. They come with their own UPS, a complete sensor set, cameras, microphones, several wireless interfacing possibilities and some of them even have a screen. Power consumption is minimal and they tend to work fine on whatever USB charger you connect them to where some SBCs are quite picky when it comes to their power supplies. Mobile devices are lacking when it comes to interfaces, they tend to have a single USB connector which doubles as a power input and as such is already occupied so if you need those GPIO pins or USB3 connectors get yourself an SBC without fretting over any 'carbon impact'.