Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by activitypea 1016 days ago
I don't think slowing down the (Google-propelled) web standards commitees is the worst thing in the world. The endless rolling release stifles browser competition. I wish we could treat the web as a protocol and say "here, this is all it does and all it will do for the next N years, make the most of it".
2 comments
jchw 1016 days ago
In general this would be a good thing, but not the way Safari does it. Why? Well, because eventually, almost everything Safari doesn't implement does get implemented in Safari, and because some of their longer running omissions smell suspiciously like conflicts of interest that hurt the ecosystem. A lot of people are incorrectly under the impression that Safari finally supports WebM and Opus, but it only does so on macOS (and every time I point this out, someone under that impression claims it has changed recently, and it never has; it's like Apple wants you to think it's supported.) Not to mention their "great" influence on the WebGPU standard and any other number of weird omissions and quirks in Safari.

It's annoying that I need Apple hardware to make sure my web applications work in Safari when I basically never need to specifically test Chrome or Firefox.

link
onlyrealcuzzo 1016 days ago
Probably not a good idea for the same reason we do not make phones a protocol and say this is all phones will do for N years, make the most of it?

YMMV. If you hate Google and love Apple - it sounds like a good idea to kill innovation at Google's expense.

There's nothing stopping the web from being frozen. Safari could do it if it wanted to. All that would happen is that Safari would lose market share.

link