[IanNorris]

This is cool from a technology point of view, but it really needs to say it's AI powered and the position does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the candidate and party. Literally on every page, right next to the output where you can't miss it. You could instead say that the reply was generated based on previous speeches and might be representative of something the candidate might say. Anything more than that and you're putting words in peoples' mouths and potentially open to litigation (I am not a lawyer).

Here on HN we're tech savvy enough to know how it works but your average voter will not necessarily be.

EDIT: It's also a ToS violation if you're using OpenAI: https://openai.com/policies/usage-policies