[solardev]

It's a pretty broad judgment call, isn't it? If it effectively chills speech, it could be a 1A issue. I guess it's up to the SC to interpret.

Thr lawsuit itself points out that, if nothing else, the California bill forces companies to editorialize on what speech is considered hateful etc. under California's guidelines. That categorization itself is a modern politicized process (especially in polarized states, deep blue or deep red) and different from older 1A protections. That wasn't my argument, but is part of the lawsuit.