[dahart]

It’s pretty bad, right? Is it possible for this to be an accident on the part of the author? I don’t see how. It seems like a clear case of bending over backwards to distort the data to tell a summary story that is opposite from the truth. This intentionally misleading comparison undermines the entire article, to me. I’m curious about why they’re trying so hard to spin the yarn that college isn’t worth it, when the data they had to look through in order to write this story demonstrates a somewhat different narrative.